I recently received an email and post on our blog from someone who wanted me to comment on a link they shared. They were refuting a recent article I posted on www.craighuey.com, regarding the research of cardiologist Dr. Malhotra, and his warnings about certain health risks regarding the COVID vaccine. Click HERE to read the article.
The link they emailed me was based on a “medical fact-check” site designed to dispute alternative or opposing views they don’t agree with, much, in the same way, Facebook “fact checkers” and fact-checkers from other social media sites operate.
Here is the email message and link I received: “Please read and comment”
And here is my reply to the email and post:
I appreciate your taking the time to send me the Health Feedback fact check review. I welcome different opinions and different points of view. I always have.
My position is not to change your opinion or your point of view. My mission is to present alternative points of view and information you may not be exposed to through traditional news outlets, including the biased media’s censorship of the government/CDC collusion with Big Tech to censor or demonize doctors and scientists with different opinions and research.
As for the Health Feedback fact check you provided, I see that they may need some fact-checkers to review their “facts”.
For example: They say the article was cherry-picking: “The article cited mainly studies suggesting a negative effect of COVID-19 vaccines but didn’t acknowledge the wider body of evidence showing that the vaccines are safe and effective.”
Their claim that the vaccine is “effective” is FALSE.
As we’ve seen repeatedly, people who have received the COVID vaccine, and multiple boosters still get COVID… Some multiple times. We’ve seen it numerous times. Biden has gotten COVID, as well as Obama, Hillary Clinton, Fauci, and just the other day the CDC director.
If you can keep getting the virus, despite being vaccinated (and receiving several boosters), it doesn’t work, and you can spread it.
Health Feedback’s claims that: “The efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: Malhotra’s article referred to the absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 0.84% reported in Pfizer’s trial as “the true value of any treatment”, as compared to the reported relative risk reduction (RRR) of 95%. This comparison gives the impression that COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective or less effective than reported, which is incorrect and has been previously misused to downplay the benefit of COVID-19 vaccines.”
Their claim that the vaccine is “effective” is FALSE as explained above.
Health Feedback’s claim: “In the article’s Acknowledgements section, Malhotra mentioned that Clare Craig and Alex Starling, members of the group Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART), rendered assistance to him in the writing of the article. According to an investigation by Logically, this organization lobbied to promote COVID-19 misinformation and has links to conspiracy groups. In the press conference (timestamp 37:55), Malhotra confirmed the HART group’s involvement in the article.”
This claim is FALSE.
The author cites Logically, a left-wing group, as a credible fact-checking source. The fact that they are claiming that HART promotes misinformation is their opinion.
The fact is Logically works with governments to curtail free speech by labeling anything that they don’t agree with or anything that bucks their narratives “disinformation”. Basically, they are Disinformation Czars.
They said masks work and that anyone that disagreed is spreading disinformation, despite the multiple studies that show masks don’t work.
They said that the vaccines are effective and that anyone that disagreed is spreading disinformation, despite the data showing a lack of efficacy and the many terrible side effects.
They said that distancing worked and that anyone that disagreed is spreading disinformation, despite later admitting that Fauci and Birks made up the protocols just so that they could “have something” for the media.
It was All FALSE.
Health Feedback’s claim:
“Malhotra’s analysis of the benefits and harms of the COVID-19 vaccines is misleading and based on cherry-picked evidence.”
Health Feedback cherry-picks Malhorta’s facts, doing exactly what they claim Malhorta has done. I can’t claim this is an outright falsehood, but it is hypocritical, misleading, and dishonest.
As for the medical jargon in the piece, I’m not a doctor and that’s why it’s important that medical professionals have a debate, especially when it comes to a vaccine.
What I do know is that more and more peer-reviewed data is coming out about the COVID vaccine — studies and data that, if true, are more than troubling and need to be examined and studied, not fact-checked away as disinformation.
Science requires competing ideas and multiple studies in order to advance. That’s the history of progress.
The history of the censorship of competing or challenging ideas and the demonizing of opposing views is one of harm, stagnation, and lack of discovery and truth.
I’ve done numerous articles on how government bureaucrats have lied to us and abused their authority and power, and I won’t reiterate them all here, but please feel free to look them up on my blog.
Remember, these fact-checkers have been wrong more often than they’ve been right, as I’ve outlined in the list above, and in past articles.
To quote a famous news organization — ”We report, you decide.”
What do you think? Email me at [email protected]
One Comment on “Controversy Explodes: Why Our COVID-19 Vaccine Warning Article Was Challenged by Big Tech and the Health Establishments”
Fabulous reply, Craig. Thank you for bothering to reply to the “fact-checker”. This is just insane!